Digital Learning Strategic Management: Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Digital untuk Meningkatkan Kompetensi Lulusan SMA Plus Al Hamidy

Article Sidebar

Published: Sep 30, 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.56327/jeltec.v4i2.223
Keywords:
Digital Learning; Strategic Management; Digital Transformation; Graduate Competencies; Data-Driven Education

Main Article Content

Linda Monika
Prodi Manajeman Pendidikan Islam, STIT Pringsewu, Lampung
Abdul Hamid
Program Pasca Manajeman Pendidikan Islam, STIT Pringsewu, Lampung

Abstract

Digital transformation in secondary education requires an approach that goes beyond technology adoption by integrating strategic planning, digital readiness, learning implementation, data-driven evaluation, and graduate competencies. This study aims to develop and evaluate the Digital Learning Strategic Management (DLSM) model as an integrated framework for managing digital learning at SMA Plus Al Hamidy. A Research and Development (R&D) approach was employed through analysis, design, development and validation, implementation, and evaluation stages. The study involved 52 students, nine teachers, one principal, and one student affairs administrator. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, model validation, N-Gain analysis, pre-test–post-test comparison, and inter-variable relationship testing. The results showed that DLSM implementation reached 81.13%, while model feasibility achieved 89.40%. Students’ competency scores increased from 66.47 to 84.63, with an N-Gain of 0.54 and a statistically significant pre-test–post-test difference (p < 0.001). Strategic planning, digital readiness, digital learning implementation, and data-driven evaluation were positively associated with graduate competencies, with digital learning implementation demonstrating the strongest relationship (β = 0.361). Graduate competencies were also positively associated with continuous strategic improvement (β = 0.428). The novelty of DLSM lies in integrating strategic planning–digital readiness–digital learning implementation–data-driven evaluation–graduate competencies–continuous improvement into a continuous digital learning management cycle. The proposed model provides a practical framework for secondary schools to manage digital transformation systematically while maintaining a measurable focus on developing graduate competencies.

Article Details

Issue
Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): JELTec (Journal of Learning Technology)
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

License Term

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

[1] E. Mukul and G. Büyüközkan, “Digital transformation in education: A systematic review of Education 4.0,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 194, Art. no. 122664, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122664.
[2] S. L. McCarthy et al., “Digital transformation in education: Critical components for leaders of system change,” Social Sciences & Humanities Open, vol. 8, no. 1, Art. no. 100479, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100479.
[3] T. M. Yuliandari, A. Putri, and Y. Rosmansyah, “Digital transformation in secondary schools: A systematic literature review,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 90459–90476, 2023, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3306603.
[4] F. Pettersson, “On the issues of digital competence in educational contexts—A review of literature,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 23, pp. 1005–1021, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s10639-017-9649-3.
[5] O. Wohlfart and I. Wagner, “Teachers’ role in digitalizing education: An umbrella review,” Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 71, pp. 339–365, 2023.
[6] M. Claro, C. Castro-Grau, J. M. Ochoa, J. E. Hinostroza, and P. Cabello, “Systematic review of quantitative research on digital competences of in-service school teachers,” Computers & Education, vol. 215, Art. no. 105030, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105030.
[7] L. Yang, A. García-Holgado, and F. Martínez-Abad, “Digital competence of K-12 pre-service and in-service teachers in China: A systematic literature review,” Asia Pacific Education Review, vol. 24, pp. 679–693, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s12564-023-09888-4.
[8] “Integration of information and communication technology in secondary education for better learning: A systematic literature review,” Social Sciences & Humanities Open, vol. 10, Art. no. 101203, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101203.
[9] I. Nagel, H. Haugsbakken, F. Pettersson, and M. Håkansson Lindqvist, “Digitalization and school leadership: A scoping review,” Frontiers in Education, vol. 11, Art. no. 1828426, 2026, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2026.1828426. Review ini menganalisis 38 studi empiris periode 2014–2024 dan menunjukkan bahwa kajian digitalisasi serta kepemimpinan sekolah masih terfragmentasi.
[10] N. J. van Eck and L. Waltman, “Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping,” Scientometrics, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 523–538, 2010, doi: 10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3.
[11] M. K. AlAjmi, “The impact of digital leadership on teachers’ technology integration during the COVID-19 pandemic in Kuwait,” International Journal of Educational Research, vol. 112, Art. no. 101928, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2022.101928.
[12] “Impact of digital leadership on users’ technology integration and digital transformation,” Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, vol. 14, Art. no. 100965, 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.jik.2026.100965. Studi terhadap 397 pendidik dan pimpinan sekolah menemukan pengaruh signifikan kepemimpinan digital terhadap integrasi teknologi dan transformasi digital.
[13] K. Tzafilkou, M. Perifanou, and A. A. Economides, “Assessing teachers’ digital competence in primary and secondary education: Applying a new instrument to integrate pedagogical and professional elements for digital education,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 28, pp. 16017–16040, 2023.
[14] A. Bueno-Baquero et al., “Bridging digital transitions: Teacher digital competence across primary and secondary education,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 31, pp. 3097–3124, 2026.
[15] “The role of digital leadership in technology-driven learning in Indonesian senior high schools,” International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 2025, doi: 10.4018/IJDET.391898. Penelitian menggunakan SEM dan konteks SMA Indonesia sehingga relevan sebagai pembanding empiris DLSM.
[16] C. Löfving, “Teachers’ negotiation of the cross-curricular concept of student digital competence,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 29, pp. 1519–1538, 2024.
[17] E. B. Mandinach and K. Schildkamp, “The complexity of data-based decision making: An introduction to the special issue,” Studies in Educational Evaluation, vol. 69, Art. no. 100906, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100906.
[18] “On the value of data-based decision making in education: The evidence from six intervention studies,” Studies in Educational Evaluation, vol. 69, Art. no. 100899, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100899.
[19] T. D. Reeves and J.-L. Chiang, “Online interventions to promote teacher data-driven decision making: Optimizing design to maximize impact,” Studies in Educational Evaluation, vol. 59, pp. 256–269, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.09.006.
[20] “Effects of a data-based decision making intervention on student achievement,” Studies in Educational Evaluation, vol. 55, pp. 58–67, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.07.002. Studi ini penting sebagai temuan pembanding, karena tidak menemukan efek utama DBDM secara menyeluruh dan menunjukkan bahwa penggunaan data dalam menyesuaikan pembelajaran bukan proses sederhana.
[21] “Supporting school leadership decision making with holistic school analytics: Bridging the qualitative-quantitative divide using fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis,” Computers in Human Behavior. Analisis terhadap hampir 3.000 sekolah di Eropa menunjukkan bagaimana kombinasi faktor sekolah dapat digunakan untuk menghasilkan wawasan strategis mengenai pengembangan keterampilan digital siswa.
[22] I. Decabooter, A. Warmoes, E. Consuegra, R. Van Gasse, and K. Struyven, “The data coach chronicles: A systematic review of human support for making data-based decision-making a success,” Teaching and Teacher Education, vol. 146, Art. no. 104641, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2024.104641